At a glance
Luma Post vs Buffer
| Criterion | Luma Post | Buffer |
|---|---|---|
| TikTok carousels | Yes | No |
| Instagram first comment | Included | Higher plan |
| 5-channel pricing | All inclusive | $30 per month |
| Visual calendar | Yes | Basic list |
| Official APIs | All | All |
What we do better
Why pick Luma Post over Buffer
01Native TikTok carousels and photos, Buffer only supports videos
02Flat-rate pricing, no extra fee per channel
03Denser visual calendar, not just a list
04Automatic Instagram first comment included
05Content recycling built-in, no external extension
Let us be honest
What Buffer does better
No tool is perfect. If these points are critical for you, stick with the competitor
→More well-known, more tutorials and online community
→Native Mastodon integration
Verdict
Our conclusion
Buffer is still a solid choice if you mostly publish on Twitter and LinkedIn and do not need TikTok. For TikTok-first creators, Luma Post is more complete and cheaper
Other comparisons
Compare to other alternatives
vs Hootsuite
The enterprise mammoth, powerful but expensive and complex...
vs Later
Instagram-first visual planner, weak on TikTok...
vs Postbridge
Aggressively priced newcomer, but few creator features...
vs Postiz
Ambitious open source, still young and unstable...
vs Metricool
Good analytics, scheduling is secondary...
vs SocialBee
Interesting content categories, dated UI...